(The Center Square) – Eight years after the completion of the Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL) and accompanying protests at the Standing Rock Sioux Reservation, the long-awaited trial between Energy ...

A pipeline company’s lawsuit against the environmental group could chill free speech, experts said. First Amendment issues ...

Court order forcing Greenpeace to pay $660m over pipeline protests will have 'chilling' impact on free speech, campaigners ...

Greenpeace’s 2016 and 2017 protest campaign against Energy Transfer’s Dakota Access Pipeline was one of the group’s most ...

Experts called the verdict “beyond punitive.” The organization plans to appeal and has already filed a countersuit in Europe ...

A jury in North Dakota ordered Greenpeace to pay more than $660 million in damages to Energy Transfer, the company behind the Dakota Access Pipeline. Energy Transfer sued Greenpeace in 2019, alleging ...

On March 19, three entities from the global environmental nonprofit Greenpeace were found liable for $667 million in damages ...

Greenpeace testified that it played only a minor, supporting role in the protests against the pipeline, which it pointed out ...

Last week, a jury ruled that Greenpeace, a left-wing environmental activist group, must pay more than $660 million to Energy ...

1 TRESPASS TO LAND Did Defendants trespass on Energy Transfer's land? 1. Greenpeace Inc. Greenpeace Fund Greenpeace International Х YES NO YES Х NO X YES NO If you answered YES as to any of the ...

"Greenpeace did not manipulate Standing Rock, but Energy Transfer has manipulated Morton County." — Janet Alkire, chairwoman ...

Energy Transfer also alleges that through defamation, Greenpeace pressured nearly half of the pipeline’s investors to withdraw or reduce their support for the project. Greenpeace maintains that ...