16h
HealthDay on MSNPerformance of AI Preeclampsia Prediction Models Deteriorates Over TimeFor the Preeclampsia Integrated Estimate of RiSk (PIERS) Machine Learning (PIERS-ML) model and the logistic regression-based ...
Overall, RIDTs had a modest sensitivity of 62.3% (95% CI: 57.9–66.6) and a high specificity of 98.2% (95% CI: 97.5–98.7%), corresponding to a positive likelihood ratio of 34.5 (95% CI ...
58 %), negative predictive values (89 % vs. 79 %), positive likelihood ratios (3.67 vs. 1.70) and negative likelihood ratios (0.15 vs. 0.32). Conclusion: The DOT score shows promise as a ...
Figure 1B shows the pelvic on femoral angle (angle between the two lines). Diagnostic accuracy: Sensitivity (SN) 55%, specificity (SP) 70%, positive likelihood ratio (+LR) 1.83 and negative likelihood ...
Nevertheless, we observed a similar test quality for the COVID-19 CT findings: positive likelihood ratio (LR +) 16.1, and negative likelihood ratio (LR−) 0.16 (Aachen: LH + 11.0 and LH− 0.06).
Results that may be inaccessible to you are currently showing.
Hide inaccessible results