Jacob DeWitte, CEO of Oklo, says regulatory tailwinds are allowing the company to make progress on innovative nuclear ...

CNA Staff, Jul 3, 2025 / 11:48 am A federal appeals court has revived a Catholic worker’s lawsuit against the Federal Reserve Bank of New York over the bank’s having fired her for refusing to ...

For most citizens, the release of Supreme Court opinions is about as exciting as watching paint dry, particularly in a case dealing with the limits of district courts in issuing universal injunctio… ...

WASHINGTON, June 27 (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court handed President Donald Trump a major victory on Friday in a case involving birthright citizenship by curbing the ability of judges to impede ...

That was the message Friday from the Supreme Court, in a landmark 6-3 opinion ending routine “universal injunctions.” This is a victory for President Trump in this case, but it will work in ...

The divided court ruled that individual judges lack the authority to grant nationwide injunctions but left open the possibility that the birthright citizenship changes could remain blocked nationwide.

The Supreme Court ruled to limit the ability of lower courts to issue nationwide orders that temporarily stop the government from enforcing a policy.

“The Bear” actor reacts to the internet’s obsession with over viral flower photos.

Can Democrats Still Fight Trump In Court? What Supreme Court’s Birthright Citizenship Ruling Means For President’s Agenda By Alison Durkee, Forbes Staff.

The ruling said parents could choose to have their children temporarily removed from classes with lessons and books that offend their religous beliefs. The court’s three liberals dissented.

Within hours of the ruling, which curbs nationwide injunctions, challengers filed new court papers seeking to block Trump's plan via a different legal avenue.

The Supreme Court's restriction on nationwide injunctions is a radical limit on the power of the federal courts. Nothing in any federal law or the Constitution justifies it.